New Command scenario: Take it, Brave York

March 12, 2014 · Posted in Command · Comment

Database – DB3000
Author – Mark Gellis

This scenario assumes that the winter of 1990 saw increased tensions between the Soviet Union and NATO. The Soviet Union, on the verge of collapse, was concerned that NATO was planning some kind of aggressive action, possibly even a decapitating nuclear strike. Sorties of naval vessels and submarines increased during this period, as the Soviets attempted to gather intelligence and to position military assets where they would be of the most use if war did break out. This, naturally, increased concerns on the part of NATO that the Soviets might be planning some kind of attack.

The title is taken from William Shakespeare’s Henry V. Henry is responding to the Duke of York’s request to lead the British vanguard at Agincourt, a decision that ultimately results in the Duke’s death.

*** FLASH *** FLASH *** FLASH ***

ATTN: Commanding Officer, HMS York.

INTEL/SITREP

Soviet activity in the North Sea has increased in recent weeks. Whitehall and Washington are both increasingly concerned that the Soviets are planning to attack Europe.

A Soviet submarine has been spotted in the waters northeast of RAF Leuchars.

ENEMY FORCES

Unknown. At least one submarine and one Soviet cruiser are known to be in your area, but additional details are currently not available.

FRIENDLY FORCES

Available forces in your region are York (D 98), Brazen (F 91), and the American submarine Dallas (SSN 700), which is chopped to your command.

Aircraft at RAF Leuchars are available to assist you.

MISSION

Locate and identify the Soviet submarine in your area. If the Soviet submarine violates the exclusion zone marked on your tactical map, force it to surface and surrender. If the Soviet submarine attempts to flee, or if your forces are attacked, you may assume the submarine has been placed in British waters with hostile intent and you may consider yourself free to sink it.

EXECUTION

Avoid initiating a confrontation with Soviet forces in international waters. If your forces are attacked, you are free to return fire.

COMMAND AND SIGNAL

Command: York

Signal: EMCON State C (Unrestricted Emissions)

Good luck. God save the Queen.

Tags: no tags

New Command Scenario: Who’s Sinking Our Ships

March 12, 2014 · Posted in Command · Comment

Database – DB3000
Author – Paul ‘Jorm’

Situation: In the last 12 hours two ships have been lost under mysterious circumstances on approach to Darwin harbour. It is suspected that they have both hit mines. Commercial traffic is still inbound and ships are maintaining holding patterns on the approaches to the harbour.

Military assets are scarce as all of Australias northwestern harbours are being cleared for mines. Indonesia has leant one Kondor class mine hunting vessel to aid efforts to reopen Darwin harbour. One Huon class is available just off Darwin.

One Orion from 11 Sqn out of RAAF base Edinburgh has just arrived as is being refuelled and reamed ASAP.

HMAS ANZAC is ready for ASW ops to the north.

Mission: Conduct mine clearing operations in the western and northern approaches to Darwin harbour.

If the mines were laid by submarines the culprit may still be in the area, use available assets to conduct ASW operations on the northern and western approaches.

All subsurface contacts are to be considered hostile.

Tags: no tags

New Command scenario: In the Calmest Waters Swim the Ugliest Fish

March 12, 2014 · Posted in Command · Comment

Database – DB3000
Author – ‘Pergite!’

“In the calmest waters swim the uglist fish” – Swedish Proverb

Background

The submarine hunts or submarine incidents were a series of several incidents involving foreign submarines that occurred in Swedish territorial waters during the Cold War, more specifically during the 1980s. In this time, there was intensive debate and speculation in Swedish media about the possibility of Soviet submarine infiltration of Swedish territorial waters.

The Swedish navy responded aggressively to these perceived threats, increasing patrols in Swedish waters, mining and electronically monitoring passages, and repeatedly chasing and attacking suspected submarines with depth charge bombs, but no hits or casualties were offically ever recorded.

Reports of new submarine sightings and television imagery of Swedish Navy helicopters firing depth charges into coastal waters against suspected intruders became commonplace in the mid-to-late 1980s. They remain, for many Swedes, one of the iconic images of the Cold War and of the Swedish relation to the Soviet Union—for some underlining what was considered a major threat to Swedish sovereignty.

Want to know more?

Scenario setting

This scenario takes place on 1 May 1985. You are acting commander of the Swedish West Naval Command (Marinkommando Väst) with HQ in Gothenburg, the port of Scandinavia. Its a national holiday and limited forces are currently available through out the country.

Two patrol vessels HMS Modig and HMS Munter are out in the Kategatt, conducing vessel traffic controll along the heavily trafficed shipping route between Sweden and Denmark. Alert figher jets are standing by at Såtenäs airbase, and the helicopters are being readied at Säve airbase. Except for the officers, all other ranks throughout your organization are manned by conscripts.

OPORD DTG 010800MAY85

Situation

Weather:

DTG 010800MAY85 – 020800MAY85

Overcast 14C+ 10% for precipitation, 4-6m/s SW, calm seas.

Friendly forces:

(PCFG) HMS HUGIN underway patrolling shipping lanes, conducting vessel traffic control iot establish recognized maritime picture.

(PCFG) HMS MODE leaving GOTHENBURG, tasked to support HMS HUGIN

HKP 4 (Y 90, Y 92, Y 95) at SÄVE

Ready Air at SÅTENÄS AFB (AJ37 Viggen ; Gustav 21, Gustav 22, Gustav 23, Gustav 24)

USSR:

Surface threat:

Soviet surface group consisting of two destroyers, one frigate and one auxiliary ship reported to be operating in the NORTH SEA.

Underwater threat:

31 unconfirmed submarine sightings have nationally been reported so far this year 10 of these on the west coast. The latest active engagement (22 depth charges dropped) against a foreign sub-surface contact was on in february 1984.

Civilian situation

Busy shipping lane (Route-T) running S-N between DENMARK and SWEDEN.

Commercial fishers active along the SWEDISH WEST Coast.
Commercial passenger traffic from GOTHENBURG to DENMARK, NORWAY and GERMANY.

Mission

Neutralize foreign submarines operating unlawfully inside SWEDISH territorial waters.
Patrol SWEDISH maritime zone and conduct vessel traffic control.

Execution

Within means and capabilities fulfill above stated mission

ROE

Free to engage any sub-surface threats within SWEDISH territorial waters (12nm from baseline).
All other ROE are in self defence.

Logistics

Forward refuling capability for rotary aviation possible in HALMSTAD.
Re-arming not possible from any forward positions at this time.

Command & Signal

EMCON
No restrictions

Tags: no tags

New Command scenario: Kiwi Strike

March 11, 2014 · Posted in Command · Comment

Database – DB3000
Author – Nick Dowling, ‘NickD’

From 1991 until 2001 No. 2 Squadron of the Royal New Zealand Air Force was stationed at the Royal Australian Navy’s air base, HMAS Albatross. As well as providing conversion training for the RNZAF’s A-4K Skyhawk pilots, the squadron provided a training asset for the Royal Australian Navy. This training typically involved the squadron’s Skyhawks making simulated low-altitude attacks on RAN warships during exercises off the south coast of New South Wales.

This scenario simulates a full-squadron attack against the guided missile frigate HMAS Canberra in early 1998.

Situation

The guided missile frigate HMAS Canberra is sailing north from the Jervis Bay area towards Sydney. The ship is at full readiness.

Orders

Launch No. 2 Squadron’s A-4Ks to locate and destroy the frigate using their radar systems and Maverick guided missiles.

HMAS Canberra is at battle stations and can be expected to put up a strong defence. A coordinated low-altitude attack is likely to be the only way of penetrating the frigate’s air defences without suffering crippling losses.

Tags: no tags

New Command scenario: Attack on H-3

March 11, 2014 · Posted in Command · Comment

Database – DB3000
Author – David Jarman, ‘Fox1’
Iran vs. Iraq
Time/Date: 4th April 1981 / 07:15 Zulu – 10:15 Local
Location: Iraq
Playable Sides: Iran

Background

After an Iraqi FROG-7 rocket attack on two of their cities, Iranian Air Force commanders were resolved to launch a fitting counterattack on Iraqi long-range strike assets.

Their aim was to eliminate or cripple the Iraqi Air Force’s Tu-16 and Tu-22 bomber squadrons, recently redeployed to the far west of the country and (in the minds of the Iraqis) outside the effective range of Iranian counterstrikes.

Unfortunately for the Iraqis, the officially-neutral Syrians had permitted Iranian tankers to be staged at Damascus Airport, opening up some interesting possibilities for Iranian strike aircraft…

Scenario Notes

This hopes to be a relatively close approximation of the actual H-3 ‘Blitz,’ with a secondary aim of providing an interesting PvP scenario for Baloogan’s Joint Command.

Orders for CMDR IRIAF

Date: 4th April 1981 / 14th Farvardin 1360

Command: Boeing 747-100, 11th TAS Detachment, Damascus.

Execution: At your discretion.

EMCON: Unrestricted.

Situation

Commander,

In the past months, our war against the Iraqi infidels has reached a stalemate, with both sides taking significant losses in the air and on the ground. Two weeks ago, in an attempt to regain the initiative on the northern front, the Iraqis used FROG-7 rockets on the cities of Dezful and Ahvaz.

It has been determined that Saddam must be punished for this dastardly attack on our people, and his long-range strike capabilities curtailed in order to protect our cities. The Tu-16 and Tu-22 bombers that have been plaguing us for so long must be dealt with.

Our intelligence sources have determined that the Iraqis have recently re-deployed their 7th and 8th Bomber Squadrons to the H3 airfield complex close to the Jordanian border, in the belief that this will put them beyond the reach of counterstrikes. Today, you will prove the Iraqis wrong.

Mission

Perform a long-range strike on the H3 facilities to destroy or damage Tu-16 and Tu-22 bombers on the ground.
Inflict maximum damage on Iraqi fighter aircraft that attempt to intercept your forces. This attrition will be beneficial to our plans for a 180-day air offensive in the near future.

Enemy Forces

The Iraqi Air Force remains a formidable opponent even after the losses we have inflicted. Fighter squadrons based at Mosul, Kirkuk, and Shaibah may prove troublesome to this operation, and are known to fly MiG-21 and MiG-23 variants.

Intelligence suggests that two squadrons of recently-acquired French Mirage F.1EQs may be operational at West Qayyarah.Baghdad continues to be heavily defended by air and surface assets. It is advised that you avoid this area during this operation.

Available Assets

Damascus International Airport*

2 x Boeing 747-100 Tanker / Airborne Command Post

*The Syrians have graciously allowed us to forward-deploy support assets to Damascus. However, as they officially remain neutral, we cannot have full access to their airspace. Use at your discretion.

Tabriz International Airport

12 x F-5E Tiger II
2 x Boeing 707-3J9C Tanker

Hamedan Air Base

10 x F-4E Phantom II
3 x RF-4E Phantom II

Dezful Air Base

16 x F-5E Tiger II

Omideyeh Air Base

8 x F-14A Tomcat

Time

You have 24 hours to accomplish this task.

Historical Notes

To increase their chances, Iranian commanders decided to fly their aircraft along a northern route passing over the mountains of the Iraqi-Turkish border. The Iranian attack against the H3 airfields was the most successful Iranian air operation since 1967. Several Iraqi aircraft were destroyed in the air and on the ground, with no loss of life on the Iranian side.

Tags: no tags

« Previous Page — Next Page »